A Review on Various Routing Protocols of Data Communication in MANET

Volume: 3    Issue: 5

Year of Publication: 2016

Pages: (9-12)

Authors: Research Scholar Yogesh Kansal, Asst. Prof. Ranbir Singh

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

After reviewing the literature review, The DYMO protocol has flaws and establish the route but failed to maintain route recovery. The other same issues in the case of AODV protocol [4] and AODVv2 protocols [5]. The extended version of AODVv2 (also known as DYMO) [5] i.e. proposed AODVv2-02 has been simulated using NS2.35 and its performance is analyzed with respect to various performance metrics. The basic operations of the AODVv2 protocol are route discovery and route maintenance. Route discovery is performed by multicasts a Route Request Message (RREQ) to find route towards destination and these RREQ message is retransmitted again and again whenever any node wants to transmit packets to another node in the network, but it creates unnecessary signaling traffic and interference.

References

1. Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti and Anil K. Verma, “Review of Various Routing Protocols for MANETs”, International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011.

2. Jatinder pal Singh and Anuj Kumar Gupta “A Review on Dynamic MANET on Demand Routing Protocol in MANETs” International Journal of advance trends in Computer Science and Engineering, ISSN No. 2278-3091, Volume 2, No.2, 2013.

3. C. E. Perkins, S.Ratliff, J.dowdell, “Dynamic MANET On-Demand (AODVv2) Routing”, Internet Draft, draft-ietf- manet- aodvv2-02, work in progress, 2013.

4. Anuj K. Gupta, Dr. Harsh Sadawarti and Dr. Anil K. Verma, “Performance analysis of AODV, DSR & TORA Routing Protocols”, ISSN: 1793-8236 IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol.2, No.2, 2010.

5. Manjeet Gupta and Sonam Kaushik, “Performance Comparison Study of AODV, OLSR and TORA Routing Protocols for MANETS”, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research / ISSN: 2250–3005 IJCER | 2013 | Vol. 2 | Issue No.3 |704-711 Page 704.

6. Narendran Sivakumar, Satish Kumar Jaiswal, “Comparison of DYMO protocol with respect to various quantitative performance metrics”, IRCSE, 2009.

7. Nehal Jadeja and Roma Patel, “Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV and DSR Routing Protocols Using NS-2 Simulator”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 3, Issue 2, 2013, pp.1825-1830.

8. Nitin Kumar, KunjVashishtha, Kishore Babu, “A Comparative Study of AODV, DSR, and DYMO routing protocols using NS2”, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 2013, Volume: 1, Issue: 9, pp. 735-739.

9. NS2 Documentation and Tutorial , http://www.omnetpp.org/ documentation.

10. Priyanshu and Ashish Kumar Maurya, “Survey: Comparison estimation of various routing protocols in mobile ad hoc network”, International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS), Vol.5, No.1/2/3, 2014.

11. Protocols”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), pp. 10-15, 2014.

12. Salim EL KHEDIRI, Nejah NASRI, Awatef BENFRADJ, Abdennaceur KACHOURI, Anne WEI “Routing Protocols in MANET: Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and DSDV Protocols Using NS2”, IEEE, Vol. 8, Issue 12, 2014.

Keywords

MANET, Classification in MANET’s, AODV, DSR, DSDV, TORA.