An evaluation of SDN facsimile, network monitoring system, measurement and its usance

Volume: 7    Issue: 2

Year of Publication: 2020

Pages: (25-36)

Authors: Saroj Singh, Dr. Kamlesh Sharma

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The paper comprises of several interfaces in between several layers of SDN architecture. There are four interfaces defined eastbound westbound northbound southbound each. Different kinds of methods & techniques, as well as targeted audiences, have been displayed concerning literature review is also defined. The components and its pros cons are well signifying its noted value. The major challenges encountered thereafter a reflected in SDN techniques and report cards through it curb its challenges and benefits discussed thereafter. The various segment of SDN is defined including its controllers those are centralized structures, distributed structure and multilayer structure. Therefore, we can conclude by abstracting a graph scale through which an audience can easily simplify its implementation thereon.

References

1. Gartner .Research methodology, Retrieved from .

2. Open Networking Foundation; October 2013. Wireless and mobile working group Charter application: use cases.

3. Helsinki. Finland. August 2012, SIGCOMM 2012, Hot topics in software-defined networking (HotSDN). Retrieved from .

4. P. Floodlight, 2016.Floodlight OpenFlow controller, Project Floodlight, [Online] Available http://www.projectfloodlight.org/floodlight/

5. S. Paul, J. Pan, R. Jain, 2011. Architectures for the future networks and the next generation internet: A survey, Comput. Commun. 34 (1) (2011) 2–42.

6. Object Management Group, 2013. SDN Application Ecosystem RFI, Software Defined Networking (SDN) Working Group (Mars 2013)

7. L. Dong, A. Doria, R. Gopal, R. HAAS, J. H. Salim, H. Khosravi, W. Wang, 2008. Forces protocol specification, Tech. Rep. draft-ietf-forces-protocol-17 (2008).

8. Brocade Communications Systems, “Network Transformation with Software-Defined Networking and Ethernet Fabrics,” California, USA, http://www.brocade.com/downloads/documents/positioningpapers/network-transformation-sdn-wp.pdf, 2012.

9. IBM, Software-Defined Networking: A New Paradigm for Virtual, Dynamic, Flexible Networking, October 2012.

10. Stanford University, “Mininet: Rapid Prototyping for Software-Defined Networks” http://yuba.stanford.edu/foswiki/bin/view/OpenFlow/Mininet , 2012.

11. Scott, R.C.2012., Wundsam, A., et al., What, Where, and When: Software Fault Localization for SDN, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2012178, July 2012.

12. Wang J, Wang Y, Hu H, Sun Q, Shi H, Zeng L. Towards a Security-Enhanced Firewall Application for OpenFlow Networks. Springer LNCS 8300, CSS 2013:92–103.

13. Monteleone G, Paglierani P. 2013. Session Border Controller Virtualization Towards \"Service-Defined\" Networks Based on NFV and SDN.IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services (SDN4FNS) 2013:1–7. 19

14. Akyildiz IF, Lee A, Wang P, Luo M, Chou W. 2014. A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks. Computer Networks 2014; 71:1–30.

15. Heller B, Seetharaman S, Mahadevan P, Yiakoumis Y, Sharma P, Banerjee S, 2010. Et al. Elastic Tree: saving energy in data center networks. In: Seventh USENIX symposium on networked system design and implementation, San Jose, CA, USA; April, 2010. Retrieved from .

Keywords

interfaces; OpenFlow, cloud composition, load balancing, routing, monitoring and measurement, network management.